Joe Watling – Placing on Stage
Joe talks about how once he finishes
installing a show the point of it is close to being reached and, after the last
people leave the opening event, the exhibition has almost entirely lost its
pull. I wonder if people on their way to the gallery this Saturday will realise
the critical incidence of their coming along, their complicity even? The
sculpture has been installed for a year and has held within it nine different
shows curated by Paul & Kirsty of SHIFT. But now the support structure has
turned to allow us to see its edges and for the shapes and people it contains
to be tilted on their axis, appearing to fall towards one corner. The rules of
the space have changed prompting the viewer to question the facts rather than re-learn
new rules. These facts - the ‘functional’ simplicity of a wall as a support,
the ‘distance’ between bodies and things, the ‘grounding’ effect of gravity –
outline the way we produce space through language. Joe is effectively throwing
the grammar of fixed objects in space up in the air, re-imagining them
occurring as events on a temporal map.
Abandoning its form and content as a
support in itself, this new stage in the life of the work emphasises the double
meaning of a ‘framework’; both the physical structure that supports the
support, and the timeframe spanning the before and after of the moment of the
reveal. The space now has windows, the original wallpaper and Artex on the
ceiling are exposed and the noise from the builders outside is raised. The sculpture
effectively frames itself through the dimensions of the original room it had
kept concealed for exactly a year. It treats the space and the pattern of
people visiting each of the shows as a discrete history, as a found object
detached from its original surroundings, turned inside-out and replaced facing
an entirely new direction.
The ‘event’ of the work happens
every time you enter the space of the sculpture. One corner has been left as it
has been for the last year - if you stand there you can imagine the space
lifting up and around however many degrees on a protractor. The centrifugal
force of this movement causes the doorway and the people outside to seem huge.
Whilst the people stood outside the sculpture inhabit the space as it is, a
living room in a council flat, made unliveable by this huge vehicular shape
caught in motion passing through the walls.
Joe uses the term ‘flipping’ to
describe this re-contextualisation within an original context. But what is it
to have perspective on a support system which normally remains contained and
therefore invisible? Is it to attack it for its deception of being there
silently influencing our behaviour? Or to imagine a dual reality of
temporal-permanence where the ground sometimes becomes the foreground? Or
perhaps to make new floating histories in the roaming architecture of people,
as destinations in themselves, as the necessary factors that make a stage a
stage.
Shama Khanna
see also:pressreleaseback